Investment Education

Investment Strategy Library

Comprehensive, research-backed explanations of every major investment philosophy — from classical value theory to modern quantitative approaches.

Core Strategies

Major Investment Philosophies

Each strategy below represents a distinct school of thought, with its own logic, tools, and trade-offs. Explore them all to build a rounded perspective.

01

Value Investing

Long-Term

Pioneered by Benjamin Graham and refined by Warren Buffett, value investing seeks to purchase securities trading below their intrinsic value — creating a "margin of safety" that protects against downside risk and positions investors for long-term appreciation.

Value investors focus on fundamental analysis: earnings power, balance sheet strength, competitive advantages, and management quality. The strategy demands patience, independent thinking, and a willingness to be contrarian when markets are irrational.

Time Horizon5–20+ years
Core MetricIntrinsic value vs. price
Risk ProfileConservative
Key ThinkersGraham, Buffett, Munger
02

Dividend Investing

Income-Focused

Dividend investing prioritises companies that distribute regular cash payments to shareholders. Rather than relying solely on price appreciation, dividend investors build compounding wealth through reinvested income streams and the disciplined selection of businesses with durable earnings power.

Key metrics include dividend yield, payout ratio, dividend growth rate, and free cash flow coverage. "Dividend Aristocrats" — companies with 25+ years of consecutive dividend growth — are a cornerstone of this strategy.

Time Horizon3–20+ years
Core MetricYield & payout ratio
Risk ProfileLow–Moderate
Key ThinkersLowell Miller, G. Fisher
03

Growth Investing

Capital Appreciation

Growth investing targets companies expected to grow revenues and earnings significantly faster than the broader market. Investors accept higher valuations — sometimes paying substantial premiums to current earnings — in exchange for anticipated future earnings power and market share expansion.

Key analytical tools include the PEG ratio, total addressable market (TAM) analysis, revenue growth trajectory, gross margin trends, and competitive moat assessment. Risk management through position sizing and portfolio diversification is essential.

Time Horizon2–10 years
Core MetricRevenue growth, PEG ratio
Risk ProfileHigh
Key ThinkersPhilip Fisher, P. Lynch
04

Index & Passive Investing

Market Returns

Based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis and decades of empirical data, passive investing argues that most active managers cannot consistently outperform the market net of fees. Rather than stock selection, passive investors hold broad market exposure through low-cost index funds and ETFs.

Jack Bogle's framework emphasises minimising costs, diversifying broadly, and maintaining discipline through market cycles. Factor investing (smart beta) adds systematic tilts toward value, size, momentum, profitability, and quality factors.

Time Horizon10–30+ years
Core MetricExpense ratio, tracking error
Risk ProfileLow
Key ThinkersBogle, Malkiel, Sharpe
05

Momentum Investing

Technical & Quantitative

Momentum investing exploits the empirically documented tendency of assets that have recently outperformed to continue outperforming over intermediate horizons. It is one of the most robust anomalies documented in academic finance literature, present across asset classes and geographies.

Cross-sectional momentum (ranking assets relative to peers) and time-series momentum (trend following) are two primary forms. Risk management is critical — momentum strategies can experience sharp reversals during market stress events.

Time Horizon1–12 months
Core MetricRelative strength, price trends
Risk ProfileModerate–High
Key ThinkersJegadeesh, Titman, Asness
06

Quality Investing

Durable Compounders

Quality investing seeks businesses with exceptional financial characteristics: high and stable returns on equity, strong profit margins, low debt levels, consistent earnings growth, and durable competitive advantages (moats). The thesis is that these businesses compound wealth reliably over long periods.

Key metrics include return on invested capital (ROIC), return on equity (ROE), gross profit margins, free cash flow conversion, and Piotroski F-Score. Quality investing bridges the gap between value and growth frameworks.

Time Horizon5–15+ years
Core MetricROIC, free cash flow
Risk ProfileLow–Moderate
Key ThinkersTerry Smith, T. Rowe Price
Financial Models

Key Valuation Frameworks

Understanding the models behind investment decisions is essential for any serious student of capital markets.

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

The DCF model is the cornerstone of intrinsic valuation. It states that the value of any asset is the sum of all future cash flows it will generate, discounted back to present value at an appropriate rate reflecting risk.

The Core Formula

Value = CF₁/(1+r)¹ + CF₂/(1+r)² + ... + CFₙ/(1+r)ⁿ + Terminal Value/(1+r)ⁿ

Where CF = expected cash flow, r = discount rate (typically WACC), and n = projection period (usually 5–10 years).

Key Inputs & Their Sensitivity

  • Revenue growth rate: Small changes in assumed growth rates dramatically affect output — the most dangerous assumption in any DCF
  • Profit margins: Operating and free cash flow margins determine how much revenue translates to distributable cash
  • Discount rate (WACC): Reflects the blended cost of debt and equity; small changes cause large value swings
  • Terminal value: Often represents 60–80% of total DCF value — the most uncertain component
  • Terminal growth rate: Should not exceed long-run GDP growth; excessive assumptions create unreliable valuations

Limitations to Understand

DCF is famously described as "garbage in, garbage out" — the output is only as reliable as the assumptions. Practitioners often run sensitivity analyses across multiple scenarios and use DCF alongside comparable company analysis to triangulate value ranges rather than single-point estimates.

Comparable Company Analysis (Comps)

Relative valuation establishes a company's value by benchmarking it against similar publicly traded companies using standardised multiples. Unlike DCF, it reflects what the market is currently willing to pay for comparable businesses.

Multiple Formula Best Used For Key Limitation
Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Market Price / EPS Profitable mature companies Distorted by accounting choices; useless for loss-making companies
EV/EBITDA Enterprise Value / EBITDA Capital-intensive industries Ignores capex requirements and working capital changes
Price-to-Book (P/B) Market Cap / Book Value Financial sector, asset-heavy Intangible assets often not reflected; less relevant for service companies
Price-to-Sales (P/S) Market Cap / Revenue High-growth, pre-profit companies Ignores profitability entirely; growth companies can be permanently overvalued
EV/EBIT Enterprise Value / EBIT Capital expenditure comparisons Affected by varying depreciation policies across companies
Frequently Asked Questions

Common Strategy Questions

Value investing has experienced prolonged periods of underperformance, particularly during the 2010s when growth stocks dominated. However, academic research consistently shows that over very long horizons (20+ years), value factors have generated excess returns across global markets. The strategy requires genuine patience and the psychological fortitude to underperform for extended periods. Many practitioners today combine value criteria with quality screens — avoiding the "value trap" of cheap companies with deteriorating fundamentals.
High-yield dividend investing prioritises current income, targeting companies with yields of 4–7% or more. This often means mature, slower-growing businesses in sectors like utilities, telecoms, and REITs. Dividend growth investing, by contrast, accepts a lower current yield (1–3%) in exchange for companies growing their dividends at 8–15% annually. Over a 15–20 year horizon, the dividend growth investor's "yield on cost" can far exceed the high-yield investor's return — illustrating the power of compounding growth over static income.
Many successful investors blend strategies across portfolio segments. A common approach is a "core-satellite" structure: a core of passive index funds (60–70% of portfolio) supplemented by satellite positions in individual value or quality stocks (20–30%) and perhaps a small allocation to higher-risk growth ideas (5–10%). The key is ensuring each position has a clear strategic rationale and that the overall portfolio's risk, correlation, and liquidity profile aligns with the investor's personal objectives and time horizon — topics always best discussed with a qualified financial adviser.
Risk in investing is multidimensional and not fully captured by volatility alone. Key dimensions include: permanent loss of capital risk (fundamentally flawed business), liquidity risk (inability to exit a position), concentration risk (over-dependence on single positions or sectors), time horizon risk (forced selling during downturns), and behavioural risk (emotional decision-making). Different strategies carry different risk profiles, and the "right" risk level for any investor depends on personal factors — financial position, income stability, psychological temperament, and time horizon — that no educational platform can evaluate for you.

Explore the Macro Dimension

Every investment strategy is shaped by the macroeconomic environment. Understand the forces that move markets.

Macroeconomic Investing